That is one brilliant lens! I haven't done any direct in depth comparisons yet, but the general voice claims that 24-120mm has better sharpness at the corners compared to the 24-70 f4. It is my impression as well. Pros for the 24-120: sharp, constant aperture, good macro capability, nice bokeh.; cons: no VR, costs. I agree. I sold my 24-70 f/4 and replaced it with the 24-200. My impression is that it takes side by side pixel peeping to see the difference in the two lenses. Even then, it's really hard to see the advantages of the 24-70. When I feel rich I'd like to buy the 24-70 f/2.8. That would give me a superior quality zoom lens when it is needed. Hey everyone ! This is the first look at the Nikon Z 24-120mm f4S. in this video we will take a look at the build & design of the lensPicture quality compare The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Nikon Nikkor Z 24-120mm f/4 S. Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. weight. #24120mm #nikon #nikonlensSubscribe 這顆鏡頭自從入手以來 搭配Z6 就一直是主力鏡頭雖然光圈為F4 但畫質實力幾乎可以跟 F卡口的24-70 F2.8不分上下加上體積小 價格又便宜 都快跟N 24-120 F4一樣了讓初入手 Z系列相機的新手 也可以有實惠優質的選擇(Nikon單眼相機 第1頁) OUHLqaL. The 28-75 and 70-180 are a well known budget combo for the z mount and are pretty damp good, you get most of the image quality of the top z glass but at a lower cost. I do prefer the 24-120 and 70-200 z personally but I shoot a lot and also use both for video work and they are a bit better as a dual purpose set of gear. In terms of weight, the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S weighs 500 grams (1.1 pounds), while the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S weighs 630 grams (1.4 pounds) – yes, the 24-70mm f/4 S wins, but it’s not a dramatic difference. The 24-70mm f/4 S is a bit more portable, but the size difference is only about 2 cm (3/4 inch). The Nikon Z system has a wealth of standard zooms, ranging from budget-friendly starters like the 24-50mm F4-6.3 ($399.95) up to pro workhorses like the 24-70mm F2.8 S ($2,399.95). The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Nikon Nikkor Z 24-120mm f/4 S. Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. weight. The Nikon Z 24-200m F4-6.3 is an impressively capable travel zoom for the company's full-frame and APS-C Z-mount cameras. It doesn't have a super-fast maximum aperture (it'd be the size of a bazooka if it did, after all), but it turns in really sharp images courtesy of its optical formula and vibration-reduction system that works in-tandem with the stabilizers in the company's full-frame models. Border performance is not bad wide open but does not really profit much when stopping down. Same story at 35mm, albeit with only little vignetting: Unremarkables at 35mm: Infinity shots with Nikon Nikkor 24-120/4.0G VR on a D800. 35mm, f4.0, 100 ISO; Below: 100% crops from the main image at different apertures.

nikon z 24 120 f4 vs 24 70 f2 8